Offbeat

Legal

Intel sued again over struggling foundry business

Derivatives claim seeks damages from execs and board members


Beleaguered chipmaker Intel has been sued yet again by shareholders over its foundry business, this time in a derivative lawsuit targeting executives and board members.

A derivative lawsuit, such as a similar claim filed in June, is brought by investors on behalf of the company, which receives any damages awarded as a result of the litigation. In a shareholder class action lawsuit, such as the one filed in August, the shareholders stand to benefit if they prevail.

The complaint [PDF], filed in federal court in San Jose, California, accuses two corporate officers – former CEO Pat Gelsinger and interim co-CEO/CFO David Zinsner – and various board members of violating securities law and their fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment and wasting corporate assets.

It seeks restitution and punitive damages from the individual defendants that, if awarded, would be paid to Intel, plus court costs for the attorneys representing the plaintiff, LR Trust. For that reason, the legal filing lists the recent compensation of the named defendants, such as the combined total of more than $207 million awarded to Gelsinger in 2021, 2022, and 2023.

The derivatives claim focuses on Intel's floundering foundry business. Gelsinger announced in October 2022 that Intel would pursue "an internal foundry model," a reflection of the company's strategic shift toward making chips both for itself and external customers.

In June 2023, the chip biz said Intel Foundry Services (IFS) would begin reporting its own profits and losses starting in Q1 2024. And on April 2, 2024, the chip maker revealed that IFS had an operating loss of $7 billion on sales of $18.9 billion in 2023.

Then in Q2 2024, the company reported an IFS operating loss of $2.83 billion, substantially worse than the foundry businesses' $1.87 billion operating loss in Q2 2023. The disappointing quarter was accompanied by layoffs and the suspension of Intel's dividend as of Q4. In December, Gelsinger resigned as CEO.

The complaint points to inadequate risk disclosure in Intel's 2024 Proxy Statement as evidence that executives and board members failed to meet their obligations to shareholders and allowed the company to make false and misleading statements about its financial prospects.

It says, "[A]s later admitted by Intel, and in breach of the individual defendants’ fiduciary duties, the true status of Intel’s affairs at the time were that: (1) IFS’s growth was not indicative of revenue growth reportable under its segment; (2) IFS experienced substantial operating losses in 2023; (3) IFS experienced a decline in product profit driven by lower internal revenue; (4) due to the foregoing, IFS could not be a strong tailwind to Intel’s foundry strategy; and (5) the Company failed to maintain adequate internal controls."

Intel, which also faces a lawsuit filed in November over chip voltage claims, declined to comment. ®

Send us news
8 Comments

Mr Intel leaving Intel is not a great sign... for Intel

Pat Gelsinger has unexpectedly quit. Gore dump follows

Just how deep is Nvidia's CUDA moat really?

Not as impenetrable as you might think, but still more than Intel or AMD would like

Intel turmoil prompts S&P Global to downgrade chipmaker's credit rating

Finance house finds x86 giant's lack of strategy disturbing

Cost of Gelsinger's ambition proves too much for Intel

At least he'll have company as he joins 15K colleagues headed for the door

Intel execs discuss the possibility of spinning off foundry

'Does it ever fully separate? I think that's an open question for another day,' interim co-CEO says

With Gelsinger gone, to fab or not to fab is the $7B question

Whoever takes over has some tough decisions to make

Jury spares Qualcomm's AI PC ambitions, but Arm eyes a retrial

The victory may be short lived as the chip designer gears up for second round

Humanoid robots coming soon, initially under remote control

Dodgy AI chatbots as brains – what could go wrong?

OneOdio Focus A5: Big battery, budget sound, and a bargain bin price

Inexpensive over-ear gear, but active noise cancelling won't block out the carol singers

Jury trial kicks off Arm's wrestling match with Qualcomm

The Nuvia buyer's alleged violations of license terms expected to last through Friday

Red Rabbit Robotics takes human form to sell work as a service

Take this job and automate it

AMD secure VM tech undone by DRAM meddling

Boffins devise BadRAM attack to pilfer secrets from SEV-SNP encrypted memory