On-Prem

Personal Tech

Facing sale or ban, TikTok tossed under national security bus by appeals court

Video slinger looks to Supremes for salvation, though anything could happen under Trump


A US federal appeals court has rejected a challenge to the law that prevents popular apps that collect data on Americans from being controlled by a foreign adversary.

The decision puts the ongoing operation of social media network TikTok, a subsidiary of China-based ByteDance, at risk.

Unless the ruling is reversed on appeal, ByteDance divests, or the White House intervenes, TikTok will be forced to stop operating in the US as soon as January 19, 2025. The President – Biden until January 20, 2025 – has the option to grant a one-time 90-day extension to this deadline.

The law at issue, initially known as the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PFACAA), became part of the foreign assistance package passed in April, after which it was approved by President Biden. It limits foreign adversaries from collecting data through adversary-controlled software applications. It also identifies ByteDance and TikTok by name, while potentially applying to code controlled by other foreign entities.

For years, US officials have warned that TikTok has the potential to be used to spy on Americans. In March, then head of NSA Cybersecurity Rob Joyce called TikTok China's "Trojan horse."

More recently, US authorities have alleged active data gathering. The US Justice Department in a July court filing accused ByteDance and TikTok of using an internal tool called Lark to allow TikTok employees in the US to communicate with ByteDance engineers in China and provide them with US users' sensitive personal information.

ByteDance, incorporated in the Cayman Islands but headquartered in China, challenged the constitutionality of the law in May.

"Banning TikTok is so obviously unconstitutional, in fact, that even the act’s sponsors recognized that reality, and therefore have tried mightily to depict the law not as a ban at all, but merely a regulation of TikTok’s ownership," the companies said in their lawsuit [PDF].

On Friday, a three-judge panel for the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously disagreed, finding the Justice Department's national security argument valid.

"The government provides persuasive support for its concerns regarding the threat posed by the PRC [People's Republic of China] in general and through the TikTok platform in particular," the appellate ruling [PDF] says, noting that the objections raised by ByteDance and TikTok are insufficient.

"[T]he bottom line is that they fail to overcome the government’s considered judgment and the deference we owe that judgment," the ruling says.

ByteDance and TikTok intend to appeal to the US Supreme Court.

"The Supreme Court has an established historical record of protecting Americans' right to free speech, and we expect they will do just that on this important constitutional issue," said TikTok spokesperson Michael Hughes in a statement provided to The Register.

"Unfortunately, the TikTok ban was conceived and pushed through based upon inaccurate, flawed and hypothetical information, resulting in outright censorship of the American people. The TikTok ban, unless stopped, will silence the voices of over 170 million Americans here in the US and around the world on January 19, 2025."

TikTok could get a reprieve from the incoming administration, however. President-elect Trump, during his first term, tried to ban TikTok. But during his recent presidential campaign, he promised to save it, perhaps largely so that Mark Zuckerberg's Meta doesn't get more of a monopoly over US social media.

In March this year, Trump, on his own ironically named Truth Social, declared without evidence: "I don't want Facebook, who cheated in the last election, doing better," adding: "They are a true enemy of the people."

Then again, he could change his mind.

If ByteDance is forced to divest but no acceptable buyer can be found, Oracle, which provides IT services to TikTok in the US, has warned its revenue could suffer. In a June SEC filing, the database titan said, "If we are unable to provide those services to TikTok, and if we cannot redeploy that capacity in a timely manner, our revenues and profits would be adversely impacted." ®

Send us news
43 Comments

Supreme Court to hear TikTok's appeal against law that would force it to shut, or sell

Will consider free speech arguments just nine days before the clock runs out

TikTok appeals to have Trump – or Supreme Court – decide its fate later

Wants to defer shutdown order that takes effect a day before the presidential inauguration

Australia passes law to keep under-16s off social media – good luck with that, mate

Also intros surveillance tweaks to protect very successful AN0M fake messaging app sting

Blocking Chinese spies from intercepting calls? There ought to be a law

Sen. Wyden blasts FCC's 'failure' amid Salt Typhoon hacks

Ransomware scum blow holes in Cleo software patches, Cl0p (sort of) claims responsibility

But can you really take crims at their word?

US reportedly mulls TP-Link router ban over national security risk

It could end up like Huawei -Trump's gonna get ya, get ya, get ya

BlackBerry offloads Cylance's endpoint security products to Arctic Wolf

Fresh attempt to mix the perfect cocktail of IoT and Infosec

How Androxgh0st rose from Mozi's ashes to become 'most prevalent malware'

Botnet's operators 'driven by similar interests as that of the Chinese state'

Microsoft won't let customers opt out of passkey push

Enrollment invitations will continue until security improves

Australia moves to drop some cryptography by 2030 – before quantum carves it up

The likes of SHA-256, RSA, ECDSA and ECDH won't be welcome in just five years

Critical security hole in Apache Struts under exploit

You applied the patch that could stop possible RCE attacks last week, right?

Suspected LockBit dev, facing US extradition, 'did it for the money'

Dual Russian-Israeli national arrested in August