Security

CSO

Mystery Palo Alto Networks hijack-my-firewall zero-day now officially under exploit

Yank access to management interface, stat


A critical zero-day vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks' firewall management interface that can allow an unauthenticated attacker to remotely execute code is now officially under active exploitation.

According to the equipment maker, the vulnerability requires no user interaction or privileges to exploit, and its attack complexity is deemed "low." There's no CVE number assigned to the flaw, which received a 9.3 out of 10 CVSSv4.0 rating, and currently has no patch.

Exploitation potentially allows a miscreant to take control of a compromised firewall, providing further access into a network. That said, the intruder must be able to reach the firewall's management interface, either internally or across the internet.

Palo Alto Networks earlier urged network hardening of its products – recommending locking off access to the interface, basically – after learning of an unverified, mystery remote code execution (RCE) flaw in its devices' PAN-OS some days ago. But in a late Thursday update, it confirmed it "has observed threat activity exploiting an unauthenticated remote command execution vulnerability against a limited number of firewall management interfaces which are exposed to the internet." 

Because of this, customers must "immediately" make sure that only trusted, internal IPs can access the management interface on their Palo Alto firewall systems — and cut off all access to the interface from the open internet. 

Until a software fix becomes available, "securing access to the management interface is the best recommended action," the vendor said. "As we investigate the threat activity, we are preparing to release fixes and threat prevention signatures as early as possible."

The Register has reached out to Palo Alto Networks for additional information about the bug, who is exploiting it, and when it expects to issue a patch. We will update this story when we hear back.

Palo Alto Networks also noted that, as of now, neither Prisma Access nor Cloud NGFW are affected.

To identify any potentially vulnerable devices that require remediation, check out this customer support portal (Products → Assets → All Assets → Remediation Required). The portal displays devices with any internet-facing management interfaces identified by Palo Alto Networks during their scans and tags them with "PAN-SA-2024-0015." If you don't see any devices listed, it indicates that no flagged interfaces were found for your account.

However, "this list may not be complete, so please ensure that you verify that all of your devices are properly configured," the security advisory warns, urging customers to follow best practices.

It's an odd situation because, as other security vendors have also noted, there have been rumors swirling of a possible zero-day bug all week. But until late Thursday, those appeared to be unsubstantiated. We will continue to monitor this story.

Meanwhile, in addition to this as-yet-unnamed CVE, on Thursday the US govt's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added two other Palo Alto Networks security holes to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog.

These include CVE-2024-9463, a critical, 9.9-CVSS-rated OS command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Expedition. This one can allow an unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary OS commands as root and lead to disclosure of usernames, cleartext passwords, device configurations, and device API keys of PAN-OS firewalls.

CISA also added CVE-2024-9465, a 9.2-rated SQL injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Expedition to its catalog of flaws under active attack. This one can be abused by an unauthenticated attacker to reveal Expedition database contents, such as password hashes, usernames, device configurations, and device API keys. 

The vendor has issued fixes for both of these flaws. ®

Send us news
28 Comments

Don't fall for a mail asking for rapid Docusign action – it may be an Azure account hijack phish

Recent campaign targeted 20,000 folk across UK and Europe with this tactic, Unit 42 warns

Ransomware scum blow holes in Cleo software patches, Cl0p (sort of) claims responsibility

But can you really take crims at their word?

How Androxgh0st rose from Mozi's ashes to become 'most prevalent malware'

Botnet's operators 'driven by similar interests as that of the Chinese state'

Critical security hole in Apache Struts under exploit

You applied the patch that could stop possible RCE attacks last week, right?

Suspected LockBit dev, facing US extradition, 'did it for the money'

Dual Russian-Israeli national arrested in August

Phishers cast wide net with spoofed Google Calendar invites

Not that you needed another reason to enable the 'known senders' setting

Iran-linked crew used custom 'cyberweapon' in US critical infrastructure attacks

IOCONTROL targets IoT and OT devices from a ton of makers, apparently

US names Chinese national it alleges was behind 2020 attack on Sophos firewalls

Also sanctions his employer – an outfit called Sichuan Silence linked to Ragnarok ransomware

How Chinese insiders are stealing data scooped up by President Xi's national surveillance system

'It's a double-edged sword,' security researchers tell The Reg

China's Salt Typhoon recorded top American officials' calls, says White House

No word yet on who was snooped on. Any bets?

Crooks stole AWS credentials from misconfigured sites then kept them in open S3 bucket

ShinyHunters-linked heist thought to have been ongoing since March

Are your Prometheus servers and exporters secure? Probably not

Plus: Netscaler brute force barrage; BeyondTrust API key stolen; and more