Off-Prem

Oracle wants to power 1GW datacenter with trio of tiny nuclear reactors

Isn't saying how much they'll cost or when they'll fire up


Oracle is going nuclear over growing demand for AI datacenters, and that's not a metaphor for Larry Ellison's mood.

On Monday's quarterly earnings call, Oracle's founder, chair and CTO revealed the database giant and cloud provider had secured building permits for a trio of small modular reactors (SMRs) to power a datacenter with over a gigawatt of AI compute capacity.

If you're not familiar, SMRs are miniaturized nuclear reactors not unlike those used in US naval vessels for nearly 70 years.

Unlike marine reactors, SMRs are designed to be mass produced. And unlike conventional reactor designs they won’t require massive physical infrastructure. In theory they’ll therefore be less expensive to operate, but still capable of producing tens or hundreds of megawatts of energy.

But no SMR is currently operating and pilot projects have not gone well. Thus, think of this more as Oracle longing for nuclear power rather than tangibly deploying it, at this stage.

Oracle's interest in SMRs as a power source comes as the cloud provider looks to expand its datacenter footprint.

"Oracle has 162 cloud datacenters, live and under construction throughout the world. The largest of these datacenters is 800 megawatts, and it will contain acres of Nvidia GPU clusters able to train the world's largest AI models," Ellison told analysts on the call. "Soon Oracle will begin construction of datacenters that are more than a gigawatt."

Execs did not say when the gigawatt-class datacenters and the SMRs powering them will come online.

However, we've previously looked at SMRs as a datacenter power source, and even the most optimistic estimates put the first deployments in the early 2030s.

We've asked Oracle for comment and will let you know if the mega-corp responds.

Despite their potential benefits, SMRs face considerable barriers to widespread deployment. Back in May, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis concluded that SMRs were "too expensive, too slow to build, and too risky to play a significant role in transitioning away from fossil fuels."

However that hasn't stopped major hyperscalers from embracing nuclear reactors – whether SMRs or conventional designs. Earlier this year Amazon acquired Talen Energy's Cumulus datacenter in a $650 million deal. Co-located alongside the 2.5 gigawatt Susquehanna nuclear power plant, the acquisition guarantees the cloud giant access to as much as 960 megawatts of capacity.

Meanwhile, Microsoft is also sufficiently interested in SMRs that it hired someone to oversee their deployment. ®

Send us news
22 Comments

Million GPU clusters, gigawatts of power – the scale of AI defies logic

It's not just one hyperbolic billionaire – the entire industry is chasing the AI dragon

US bipartisan group publishes laundry list of AI policy requests

Chair Jay Obernolte urges Congress to act – whether it will is another matter

Cheat codes for LLM performance: An introduction to speculative decoding

Sometimes two models really are faster than one

Take a closer look at Nvidia's buy of Run.ai, European Commission told

Campaign groups, non-profit orgs urge action to prevent GPU maker tightening grip on AI industry

Infosec experts divided on AI's potential to assist red teams

Yes, LLMs can do the heavy lifting. But good luck getting one to give evidence

AI's rising tide lifts all chips as AMD Instinct, cloudy silicon vie for a slice of Nvidia's pie

Analyst estimates show growing apetite for alternative infrastructure

Day after nuclear power vow, Meta announces largest-ever datacenter powered by fossil fuels

Louisiana facility's three natural gas turbine plants to churn out 2,262 MW

Just how deep is Nvidia's CUDA moat really?

Not as impenetrable as you might think, but still more than Intel or AMD would like

Are you better value for money than AI?

Tech vendors start saying the quiet part out loud – do enterprises really need all that headcount?

Apple called on to ditch AI headline summaries after BBC debacle

'Facts can't be decided by a roll of the dice'

Apple Intelligence summary botches a headline, causing jitters in BBC newsroom

Meanwhile, some iPhone users apathetic about introduction of AI features

American cops are using AI to draft police reports, and the ACLU isn't happy

Do we really need to explain why this is a problem?